Optimality of linearity with collusion and renegotiation

نویسندگان

  • Mehmet Barlo
  • Ayça Özdogan
چکیده

This study analyzes a continuous–time N–agent Brownian moral hazard model with constant absolute risk aversion (CARA) utilities, in which agents’ actions jointly determine the mean and the variance of the outcome process. In order to give a theoretical justification for the use of linear contracts, as in Holmstrom and Milgrom (1987), we consider a variant of its generalization given by Sung (1995), into which collusion and renegotiation possibilities among agents are incorporated. In this model, we prove that there exists a linear and stationary optimal compensation scheme which is also immune to collusion and renegotiation. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: C61; C73; D82; D86

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Collusion and Renegotiation in Principal-Supervisor-Agent Models∗

We aim at examining the interactions between collusion and renegotiation in a principal-supervisor-agent framework, in which the supervisor and agent can collude while the principal can subsequently renegotiate. Despite common sense and the findings in the literature that collusion and renegotiation are usually costly when considered separately, we find that they play a weakly positive role whe...

متن کامل

Collusion, renegotiation and implementation

We study the implementation problem for exchange economies when agents can renegotiate the outcome assigned by the planner and can collude. We focus on the use of sequential mechanisms and present a simple su1⁄2cient condition for implementation with renegotiation in strong perfect equilibrium. We present an application to optimal risk sharing, showing that the possibility of collusion and rene...

متن کامل

Communication, Renegotiation, and the Scope for Collusion<xref ref-type="fn" rid="f1" ptype="fmic62247" citart="citart1"><sup></sup></xref>

We study the effect of communication in an experimental game where cooperation is consistent with equilibrium play if players share an understanding that cheating will be punished. Consistent with communication acting as a coordinating device, credible preplay threats to punish cheating are the most effective message to facilitate collusion. Promises to collude also improve cooperation. Credibl...

متن کامل

Renegotiation in Repeated Oligopoly Interaction

Standard repeated-interaction theories of oligopoly make collusion seem much easier than a \structural consensus" suggests that it is. I show that more intuitive results can emerge if colluders could renegotiate after a deviation. In repeated Bertrand oligopoly, if agreements are subject to a certain kind of frictionless renegotiation, then full collusion is impossible with more than three rms,...

متن کامل

Collusion Theory in Search of Robust Themes: A Comment on Switgard Feuerstein’s Survey

In this comment the survey by Feuerstein is taken as a point of departure to discuss some of the key challenges facing collusion theory in its application to competition and trade policy. The main issue is one of robustness. It is discussed that the popular use of equilibria with Nash reversion leads to highly non-robust results and contrasts this with a recent approach aimed at detecting robus...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Mathematical Social Sciences

دوره 71  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014